3 ms·
Why don't you replace it system-wide?
by segfaultbuserr 8y ago
Why don't you replace it system-wide?
- matthewaveryusa 8y agoIt's a shared system and I'm not going to prohibit the free exercise of other people's religions even though mine is clearly better.
- mikepurvis 8y agoAgree, couldn't this be done with a bind mount or something?
- segfaultbuserr 8y agoThe catch is old programs that depend on the blocking behavior of /dev/random during early boot could be an issue. Unlikely to be a problem on a server, though...
- masklinn 8y agoIf they're doing the replacement at runtime, the cold start is probably long done with.
- jrockway 8y agoA bind mount? Just open up the source code and add a "u" where necessary.
- vageli 8y ago> A bind mount? Just open up the source code and add a "u" where necessary. So, recompile every program and every subsequent update to use this functionality or...bind mount. One of these sounds easier than the other.