> Women don't learn how to sew and men don't learn how to woodwork, and no one knows how to budget. Instead of removing these classes, why provide them to both

> Women don't learn how to sew and men don't learn how to woodwork, and no one knows how to budget. Instead of removing these classes, why provide them to both boys and girls instead, maybe in a modernized form? I did take both? At a standard public school in Canada. I think it depends on jurisdiction, and I'd guess if those classes aren't provided, it's more likely because they're more expensive to teach (sewing machines, cook surfaces, woodworking tools are all very expensive).