3 ms·

Thanks for the interesting read. I think the WSJ should have touch upon “open standards” vs. the standards aka patents. They may have alluded to it, but only sl

Thanks for the interesting read. I think the WSJ should have touch upon “open standards” vs. the standards aka patents. They may have alluded to it, but only slightly. WSJ kinda missed the boat here.

frosted-flakes 8y ago
This is a New York Times article.