3 ms·
>The real problem is that today's technology is generally much more complicated than it used to be. I broadly disagree - the proportion of people who can fix a
by jdietrich 8y ago
>The real problem is that today's technology is generally much more complicated than it used to be.
I broadly disagree - the proportion of people who can fix a TV is probably no lower now than it was in the 1970s; a modern TV might be more complex, but the accessibility of information, tools and parts is far better.
The wider issue is the broadly positive fact that automation has drastically reduced the cost of goods relative to labour. The range of products and failure modes that are economically repairable is much narrower, because repair is relatively more expensive and replacement is relatively cheaper. Generally speaking, the most expensive part of repairing a TV is simply the labour cost of dismantling and reassembling it. As mentioned in the article, paying a seamstress to patch a jacket or darn a sweater is often more expensive than just buying a new one. There are worse problems in the world than "we've got so good at making stuff cheaply that it isn't worth the effort to fix it".
- darkerside 8y agoIt's both. Things are so much cheaper to buy because the marginal cost of a factory assembling parts (on hundreds of widgets a minute) is ridiculously cheap. But also, a set of tools was once a necessity, because things were built to be repaired. Now it's a luxury item for most people. Simple things like changing oil are, in most cars, way more complicated and difficult than they used to be, because the market has spoken. Easy DIY maintenance is not the priority.
- hopler 8y agoThe waste and pollution of mass production are kind of a problem,if you believe in anthropogenic climate change, for example.
- dTal 8y ago>broadly positive fact that automation has drastically reduced the cost of goods relative to labour Only because the huge negative external costs of a new appliance aren't priced in - pollution created in manufacture, environment disposal of the old one, long-term exhaustion of raw materials.
- egypturnash 8y agoModern flat screens are much more likely to be glued together in ways that make it nearly impossible to repair them, too.
- mdorazio 8y agoExactly. Had part of the bottom LED backlighting strip go bad on a monitor recently. I'm no stranger to electronics work, but repairing it proved impossible due to the way the monitor was manufactured, even if I had been able to source proper replacements. Compare that to old CRTs I used to repair in high school by swapping out parts you could often find at radio shack and get to with just a screwdriver.
- DanBC 8y agoMuch higher risk of death with a CRT though.
- mdorazio 8y agoTrue, but not too much higher if you're careful to ground out the HV circuitry before you touch anything. It's also not nearly as high a risk as people tend to think [1]. [1] http://lowendmac.com/2007/the-truth-about-crts-and-shock-danger/ http://lowendmac.com/2007/the-truth-about-crts-and-shock-dan...
- FrojoS 8y agoAgreed with everything but the last sentence. It is certainly a problem, as it ends up in using up more resources, more energy and creates trash.
- twtw 8y agoThe primary failure mode of a TV in the 70s was a tube that went bad. Easy fix: open TV, pop out old tube, pop in old tube, done. If a TV breaks now, it's some component that's either glued in or soldered in, so good luck replacing that. Modern TVs are not designed to have replaceable parts.
- JauntyHatAngle 8y ago>The primary failure mode of a TV in the 70s was a tube that went bad. Easy fix: open TV, pop out old tube, pop in old tube, done. I'm not sure reseating a broken component would help, I think you might mean "new" :)
- twtw 8y agolol yes, thank you.