3 ms·
Even accepting your premise, which I don't... Is it ethical to require half of the species to be dependent just for societal stability?
by XMPPwocky 8y ago
Even accepting your premise, which I don't...
Is it ethical to require half of the species to be dependent just for societal stability?
- lotsofpulp 8y agoI never insinuated that half the species should be dependent for social stability. In a previous comment, I mentioned it was plausible a one woman-one man (or any 1 to 1 partnership ignoring genders) results in more stable societies due to less competition.