People deserve to be judged on the outcomes they achieve and the evidence they provide. Sure, much of the evidence around for this stuff is anecdotal or n=1 pa

People deserve to be judged on the outcomes they achieve and the evidence they provide. Sure, much of the evidence around for this stuff is anecdotal or n=1 pathology results, but it's necessarily the case that anecdote and small-sample data is the first step in the chain of events that can lead to scientific findings. If your point is simply that sometimes people believe things that are untrue, that is obvious to the point of banality. If it’s that anyone experimenting with carnivore diets and reporting positive results should by-default be treated with distrust or contempt, your point seems to lack both compassion and scientific awareness.