I don't think you are and thanks for the link. I need to read it again more carefully, but on a first read the results seem completely unsurprising. Seems to be

I don't think you are and thanks for the link. I need to read it again more carefully, but on a first read the results seem completely unsurprising. Seems to be a problem with labeling this behavior "collusion" in that it gives more agency to the agents than they deserve.