3 ms·
That's a redundant question, because just about every registry can dictate what their TLDs can be used for. It's part of the design laid down by ICANN. - For
by bduerst 8y ago
That's a redundant question, because just about every registry can dictate what their TLDs can be used for. It's part of the design laid down by ICANN.
- For Verisign with .com, they don't care if you're really a company or not.
- With Minds & Machines and .law, they only want qualified lawyers, courts, legal schools, etc. using the TLD.
Keep in mind that the registry and registrar are different things.
- prepend 8y agoI think the difference is that Google boots folks off YouTube for political purposes while VeriSign does not kick people away from their .com.
- bduerst 8y agoGodaddy banned Gab for political reasons as well. While you can split hairs and say that's just a registrar, you can also split hairs and say that youtube is just a hosted content platform. If you're thinking of running another infowars then I would advise avoiding registering domains with any major tech platform in general.
- heavyset_go 8y agoGoogle has a track record of being capricious with bans, whereas other companies do not.
- ldiracdelta 8y ago@bduerst, Forgive my ignorance, but just to distill it down to brass tacks: In this case, Google is the registry and thus the supreme court of who can and cannot be on this domain and there is no recourse if they yank your claim on the domain? Is it more nuanced than that?
- bduerst 8y agoI mean, the entire domain name infrastructure is set up so that someone along the path can revoke registrations, all the way up to ICANN itself. IME you're much more likely to be banned by the registrar than the registry itself. Registries want people to use their TLDs, so they're not going to reject post-registration unless you've changed how you're using the TLD and it's violating the rules they originally laid down. Registrars are much more consumer facing and will act accordingly - i.e. GoDaddy banning Gab.