3 ms·
This is simply incorrect. As the person who (led? handled?) the shutdown/archiving, the vast majority of the 'developer' web had gone to github. The handful of
by cdibona 8y ago
This is simply incorrect. As the person who (led? handled?) the shutdown/archiving, the vast majority of the 'developer' web had gone to github. The handful of active projects were given white glove treatment once we decided to shutter the site.
- ebg13 8y ago> the vast majority of the 'developer' web had gone to github I see hundreds of thousands of repositories on Github responding to the search "Automatically exported from code.google.com", which means they only transferred _after_ the shutdown was announced (when the export tool went live). Any wikis would have had to be hand-converted to not be broken, since the markup between the two systems was not compatible. I mean, thank you for handling it as well as it was handled, and thank you for (if you were part of that) the export tool, but let's not pretend that it wasn't disruptive.