9 ms·
Nobody is going to be a sperm donor anymore because of consumer DNA testing. It's not worth the risk. Just wait until some court makes the donor pay child suppo
by MagicPropmaker 8y ago
Nobody is going to be a sperm donor anymore because of consumer DNA testing. It's not worth the risk. Just wait until some court makes the donor pay child support.
- eloff 8y agoShould be pretty easy to show the trail of evidence at the sperm bank. I don't think that's a real risk.
- tomp 8y agoDoesn’t law exempt you from child support obligation if you donate sperm (via a legal clinic, not “have sex with a friend” way)? Otherwise companies could offer insurance as well, or make hopeful mothers sign a contract...
- xyzzyz 8y agoIn states that adopted Uniform Parentage Act, yes. In others, not necessarily.
- onetimemanytime 8y agoI think that in all other cases, but sperm bank ones, biological fathers have been forced to pay. At least I've read all kinds of such stories. They can't make sperm bank donors pay child support or else no one would donate, ruining the chance of having kids for a lot of people.
- JustSomeNobody 8y agoSomeone could certainly sue to try to get support, but I doubt they’d be successful.
- goldenkey 8y agoThe kid could sue, itd definitely be an easier case to win since they are just the collateral victim in the situation
- onetimemanytime 8y agoThe support is always about the kid, no matter who requests it, be it mom or the state "welfare" officers.
- goldenkey 8y agoHaven't there been cases where parents keep the support checks for themselves?
- onetimemanytime 8y agoWell, a two year can't go shopping etc. so an adult that takes care of her uses the money for food, clothes, rent or whatever. And you can't really micromanage mom or the custodian, unless there's neglect.
- jedberg 8y agoI'm not sure about that. A lot of the donors need the money and don't really care if the kid finds out. Also, some donors do it to "spread their seed" and would probably be happy to find out how their kids turned out.