3 ms·
The beauty of RDF is it can support schema promiscuity i.e. you can have many schemas for your same data. You can do that with OWL. In typical graph databases y
by pklee 8y ago
The beauty of RDF is it can support schema promiscuity i.e. you can have many schemas for your same data. You can do that with OWL. In typical graph databases you are fixed on nodes, properties and edges, but in RDF you can choose what should be node and properties arbitrarily. My issue with RDF has been performance works great for categorical, relationship heavy data, but not so much for numerical data.
- mark_l_watson 8y agoI am also a fan of RDF and OWL. My two ‘practical semantic web’ books (one in Common Lisp and one for Jave/Clojure/Scala) are now 8 years old, but you can get free PDFs from my web site. Those books badly need second editions, the material is interesting but outdated.
- gibsonf1 8y agoMark, are you up for helping with solid security for cl-solid? (The library now works with both Neptune and Allegrograph) https://github.com/gibsonf1/cl-solid https://github.com/gibsonf1/cl-solid - live use of cl-solid library here https://graphmetrix.net https://graphmetrix.net , sometimes very lively discussion of Solid here: https://gitter.im/solid/chat https://gitter.im/solid/chat (including Tim BL)
- mark_l_watson 8y agoI have no time right now. Contact me in 5 weeks and we can talk then.
- gibsonf1 8y agoGreat
- detaro 8y agoWhat's a modern, easy to get started with RDF-compatible database?