3 ms·
I interpret that as ‘people may as well spend money on wholly useless frivolities because charity is not 100% efficient’. I disagree with that.
by code_duck 8y ago
I interpret that as ‘people may as well spend money on wholly useless frivolities because charity is not 100% efficient’. I disagree with that.
- notfromhere 8y agono, it's because charity is capricious and people shouldn't have to depend on one person's whim to fund causes.