> But I'm not sure how much sense it makes for a child that doesn't face this environment or is more practically minded. Is there such a thing as an unimaginat

> But I'm not sure how much sense it makes for a child that doesn't face this environment or is more practically minded. Is there such a thing as an unimaginative child (or a practical one, for that matter)? As a child I seem to recall that all my friends and classmates were imaginative and creative, and my child and his friends are just the same in that way. Lego is universally popular, as is playing "pretend", and so on. Obviously these traits are present in children to different degrees, but I think the point of this book is to emphasize that the lack of imagination and creativity in adults and its replacement by banality and commercialism is the product of socialization and choice. > Imagine the story was written in the same manner, but in praise of physical coordination/agility instead We'd probably be offended if, in that case, the uncoordinated people were drawn as obese (although the same effect could be achieved by simply displaying them as immobile). What's interesting, though, is that the book actually could be written that way. Children are far more active than adults and, because physical coordination and agility can be improved through practice, are often faster and more nimble than adults (I'm speaking anecdotally here, but if you visit a playground and watch a kid evade their parent and the point is made.) Just as imagination and creativity are often lost or suppressed on the journey to adulthood, many people also shed their love of physical activity, with unfortunate results. Perhaps the point, ultimately, is that there's lots we can learn from children, and much that is in them innately that we can help nourish.