3 ms·

I think I’m capable of writing decent performant code without pairing.... You think you are, but you've never tested this thought and scoff at the idea that yo

I think I’m capable of writing decent performant code without pairing.... You think you are, but you've never tested this thought and scoff at the idea that you could be wrong, despite being told from experienced people who have tested it that you are wrong? Is your argument seriously "I've never done it, but it doesn't work" to someone saying "I've done lots of it and it works well"?

scarface74 8y ago
Again, seeing that my first experience as a hobbyist was rewriting programs in assembly in the 80s that were too slow in higher languages on a 1Mhz 65C02 based computer, my second job as a professional was dissecting C compiler output to see how I could optimize the code generated or at times rewrite it in x86 assembly (custom printer drivers for industrial printers) and my third job was optimizing a proprietary compiler/IDE for Windows Mobile devices. I think I have a little more experience optimizing code than someone who has been doing it “for six years”.
- jodrellblank 8y ago
  This is finding your identity as a performance programmer challenged, and defending your identity instead. "That sounds stupid, but they claim it's good, so I'll try it and see if I can learn anything". "look at my credentials, don't question me, this other person can't know anything I don't, how dare anyone suggest I can learn anything from anyone else, don't you know who I am? Also they're a n00b."
  - scarface74 8y ago
    You act as if I’ve never sat with another developer brainstorming which is different than constant pair programming. I wasn’t the one who bragged about six whole years of experience