To an extent it is the government's job to police rural areas. For example if a rural area says that no gay people or no black people are allowed, should the go

To an extent it is the government's job to police rural areas. For example if a rural area says that no gay people or no black people are allowed, should the government not step in and allow then to self-govern? Should they be allowed to lynch whoever they want under the guise of ensuring cultural homogeneity? That would also fall under the rallying cry of homogenous culture you've been talking about, as those same rural people fear gay people or black people for similar reasons as immigrants. And the reason why I use such strong words is because this is the exact excuse the KKK has used in the past to demonize other minority members of a community. And the rallying cry of abolish ice is nowhere near the level of the demand for the wall, considering we have very prominent examples of ICE abusing it's authority, from deporting actual US citizens to harassing communities. If a branch is thoroughly corrupt then I would hope our officials would listen to the voters when they demand reform. And that reform involves tearing down ICE and building a better agency.