It effectively reduces to the same thing In no way is it the same thing. This comment and the tweet he linked to indicate that they believed the money was bei

It effectively reduces to the same thing In no way is it the same thing. This comment and the tweet he linked to indicate that they believed the money was being paid to Amazon soon, and that because Amazon has backed out, that money can now be spent on government projects. That is just factually incorrect. The money does not and will not exist - it was an estimate of tax savings had the deal gone through.