3 ms·
The article gives an example of an individual who may not have deserved to be on the list. By stating "No person would be on BOLO without credible cause", they
by glitcher 8y ago
The article gives an example of an individual who may not have deserved to be on the list. By stating "No person would be on BOLO without credible cause", they are using a circular logical fallacy (begging the question?) to dismiss any possibility that there may be mistakes made in managing that list.
- traek 8y agoCircular logic is "No person would be on BOLO without credible cause, and the credible cause is that they're on BOLO". What they're saying is that there is a valid reason for each person on the list to be on it. You can take issue with that as a matter of factual accuracy, but there's no tortured use of language happening.