Also seems like a matter of instrumental rationality: >First, means to an end can be costly, or otherwise objectionable. Suppose that I ought to take a job in

Also seems like a matter of instrumental rationality: >First, means to an end can be costly, or otherwise objectionable. Suppose that I ought to take a job in Alaska. One (sufficient) means is to fly there; another (sufficient) means is to take free passage on a merchant ship. But flying costs more than I would earn there. Presumably, I ought not fly. It may be said that I have some reason to fly, but that it is outweighed. This is an argument against Ought Sufficiency.