3 ms·

Are there any guidelines for chromium development? It seems like one can just commit a feature to it and make half the world use it. Regarding URL hash abuse e

by kreetx 8y ago

Are there any guidelines for chromium development? It seems like one can just commit a feature to it and make half the world use it. Regarding URL hash abuse elsewhere: this current development in Chromium is different from front-end frameworks and specific websites doing it because SomeSite can't break OtherSite while both having a different way to handle the hash. Now Chromium randomly claims part of the hash which others now need a workaround for? Are these devs serious? edit: dear downvoter, explain yourself :)

Sujan 8y ago
Explanation: > ... and make half the world use it. vs. > Add about:flag for Scroll-To-Text > Adding chrome://flag to allow users (particularly on Mobile) to easily enable and test the feature. (Commit message via https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1470735 https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/14...) So nobody will use the feature unless they explicitly choose to.
- kreetx 8y ago
  Sure, but that won't stay to be the case since otherwise no needle-moving group would start to use it, so what would step 2 be?
bokan 8y ago
> Are there any guidelines for chromium development? Absolutely! Launching a change to the web platform is a long, arduous process. This feature is currently taking the very early first steps. For more details, see https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features.
- kreetx 8y ago
  Thank you for the link and I may have come off a bit harsh with that last sentence. Having some feature like this for the web would in itself be good, just claiming a key in the hash part just for this would (and I know that hash doesn't really have a format so "it's not a key" etc, but it does gets used that way). A proposition: instead of using plain 'targetText' how about having some prefix for all Chromium's claims in the hash part so that the front-end (framework) developers can filter these out without needing to keep a list? Good luck!

by kreetx 8y ago

Sujan 8y ago

Explanation: > ... and make half the world use it. vs. > Add about:flag for Scroll-To-Text > Adding chrome://flag to allow users (particularly on Mobile) to easily enable and test the feature. (Commit message via https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1470735 https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/14...) So nobody will use the feature unless they explicitly choose to.

kreetx 8y ago
Sure, but that won't stay to be the case since otherwise no needle-moving group would start to use it, so what would step 2 be?

bokan 8y ago

> Are there any guidelines for chromium development? Absolutely! Launching a change to the web platform is a long, arduous process. This feature is currently taking the very early first steps. For more details, see https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features.

kreetx 8y ago
Thank you for the link and I may have come off a bit harsh with that last sentence. Having some feature like this for the web would in itself be good, just claiming a key in the hash part just for this would (and I know that hash doesn't really have a format so "it's not a key" etc, but it does gets used that way). A proposition: instead of using plain 'targetText' how about having some prefix for all Chromium's claims in the hash part so that the front-end (framework) developers can filter these out without needing to keep a list? Good luck!