3 ms·
It's also a much more efficient processor architecture. On paper it's same as x86 or ARM but RISC-V is modular and open that means that ever manufacturer can
by kabacha 8y ago
It's also a much more efficient processor architecture.
On paper it's same as x86 or ARM but RISC-V is modular and open that means that ever manufacturer can extend it and modify it for specific cases. That means more efficient niche devices like small computers, tablets, robots and all sorts of cool stuff and all of them running on same architecture!
The fact that we're stuck with this blob for processor architecture is just sounds so archaic when you learn about RISC-V.
Everyone should be excited for this!
- kingosticks 8y agoHowever, as soon as you start modifying/extending hardware you take on enormous risk and require considerable more expertise and development time. Yes, a modular design may allow you to disable your extension (if it's bugged) and still get a saleable device but then you've spent all those extra resources for no benefit. Not to mention the huge quantities you still need to make this financially viable. Basically, it'll cost you a load more to do something custom, you could have just used the next model up for less. RISC-V can't solve any of this. I guess you could argue that you can build your more efficient hardware with an older, cheaper process and maybe still end up with something competitive. I don't see the tablet market being served by RISC-V, what benefits does it bring? Someone like WD getting onboard makes some sense but that's not exciting, they just want to save a bit of cash.
- renox 8y agoColor me skeptical: ForwardCom or the Mill are CPU designs which bring real improvements, but for me the RISC-V is a tweaked MIPS with an open ISA.