6 ms·
I disagree. You're right that the effects of our actions on the climate are not directly observable by laypeople. And that the scale of the problem is dauntin
by mac01021 8y ago
I disagree.
You're right that the effects of our actions on the climate are not directly observable by laypeople. And that the scale of the problem is daunting.
But it is _critical_ that we fix the underlying problem in the next couple of decades. The scale of the problem means we can't fix it without help and motivation from the government, so we need to agitate now, today, for the government to put a price on carbon emissions.
There's even a bill for a carbon fee-and-divident right now. But it will never pass as long as we're all not focusing on climate change.
When it does pass, the incentives will suddenly be right for us to solve the problem.
- RandallBrown 8y agoI think the problem is marketing. Taxing carbon emissions for climate change is unpopular because people can't understand the problem it's trying to solve. Taxing carbon emissions so they have a clear view on sunny days is a lot more understandable.
- mac01021 8y agoWe could completely solve smog without making even a tiny dent in our carbon footprint. Why not instead try to get people to understand the real problem?