8 ms·
It is less about the average American worker and more about statistics. There are 1 billion Indians and Chinese each. When a few thousand of them are migrating
by screye 8y ago
It is less about the average American worker and more about statistics.
There are 1 billion Indians and Chinese each. When a few thousand of them are migrating to the US every year, you get to meet the candidates that have been pre-screened to be among the best in their respective could tries.
Now since the US has better amenities, the 99th percentile Indian, probably rubs shoulders with a 95th percentile American. But even then, there are just as many 99th percentile Asians as there are 95th percentile Americans (due to population differences)
If Amazon needs a person who is in the 95th percentile on Math/Analytics/CS , then at a certain point they run out of Americans. They then have 2 options. Either hire 99th percentile Indians or lower the hiring bar.
IMO, the US has managed to stay on top in the tech through shameless poaching of top talent across the world. (Among other things)
Letting go of this talent, across the board, might lead to short term citizen job growth, but may cause long term job loss as companies setup base elsewhere, in search of talent or competition gets stiffer.
- geofft 8y agoWhy should Amazon "run out of" Americans? If they want the best candidates and the pools are statistically equivalent, they should be taking Indians, Chinese, and Americans in proportion to their worldwide population from their first hires onwards. The only reason to prefer Americans is American government intervention. Without a government telling you who you can hire and who you can't - and in particular, in the utopia of John Galt - there's no rational reason for Amazon to prefer extending offers to people born anywhere vs. people born anywhere else.