"you need to be thinking about implications" Thinking about it, won't put food on your table. These are not necessarily similar to "exploit" codes, but more li

"you need to be thinking about implications" Thinking about it, won't put food on your table. These are not necessarily similar to "exploit" codes, but more like a box of innocuous tricks often needed for good purposes. Gather enough of those throw enough compute, then you go from something that a human can perceive as obviously false, to something human-like. There are plenty of people out there, with the competence to replicate those results, yet only a few big companies reap most the rewards, monopolize user data and interactions, and open-source for free results which could have been monetized by a company to provide useful services to users. Seriously, how can one expect that most of those Phd who didn't get recruited don't use AI for nefarious uses?