>it seemed as if there were mostly studies linking it to cancer etc in vitro or in rodents etc, not so much or even none in humans. context: (14 January 2019

>it seemed as if there were mostly studies linking it to cancer etc in vitro or in rodents etc, not so much or even none in humans. context: (14 January 2019 ) As one reviewer put it: “The article transparently lays out not just that the EPA and IARC came to different conclusions about the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides, but how this result occurred and its impact on the overall conclusions about its carcinogenicity. The analyses contained in this article and accompanying text enhances the understanding of the state of the science of the potential carcinogenicity of glyphosate-based herbicides and gaps in understanding that future studies may help to resolve. As such, it is an important contribution to the literature” ----------- more ( & Open ) ----------- Editorial: "Some food for thought: a short comment on Charles Benbrook´s paper “How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?” and its implications" https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-019-0187-z https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-0... ----------- more ... more ... ( & Open ) ----------- (14 January 2019) "How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?" https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-018-0184-7 https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-0...