3 ms·
I bought a house in CA a few years ago and had to assume the previous owner’s SunRun lease. I didn’t really want to but even if it ends up costing me slightly m
by zeroonetwothree 8y ago
I bought a house in CA a few years ago and had to assume the previous owner’s SunRun lease. I didn’t really want to but even if it ends up costing me slightly more in the long term (for now it’s unclear) it’s very minor in the land of $1.5 million housing. This article seems to be making a huge deal over a minor $30/month cost.
- netsharc 8y agoThe article started with something that would cost that much but (as the investigative reporter finds out) is seemingly the tip an iceberg of a fraudulent business.
- sjg007 8y agoI think that's the scenario that happens the most often. My guess is that both parties here agreed to transact and then the TPO came out. Still it is not clear why the estate didn't just back out of the sale and then relist with the solar panel TPO disclosed. I guess the house only had one offer?
- michaelt 8y agoThe article says the payments to buy out the contract totalled $27,300. I wish I had the kind of income that made me call that a 'minor cost' !
- aidenn0 8y agoThat's about a third of what the realtors get on a $1.5M sale.