3 ms·
It is entirely unclear how any controls were implemented. They say "after controlling for lifestyle factors" but do not say which factors nor how they controlle
by floathub 8y ago
It is entirely unclear how any controls were implemented. They say "after controlling for lifestyle factors" but do not say which factors nor how they controlled for them. It is entirely possible, perhaps even likely, that diet beverages are simply a proxy for some other factor. Maybe even just weight. To wit:
"This association may also be contributed
to by rising blood pressure and sugars
that were not yet diagnosed as hypertension
or diabetes but warranted weight loss,"
thus leading the women in the study to take
up diet beverages, said Dr. Keri Peterson,
medical advisor for the Calorie Research Council, an
international association representing the low- and
reduced-calorie food and beverage industry.
This possibility makes the implication that there is some causal relationship pretty tenuous. This question:
"What is it about these diet drinks?" asked
lead study author Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani ...
might well be answered with, "nothing at all actually".
(edited for quotes because I keep forgetting this is not markdown)
- toasterlovin 8y agoWelcome to all of nutrition science. As a field it is characterized by a dearth of studies which are actually capable of demonstrating causation. Almost every study is simply a measurement of correlation. And then you get these moronic interpretations of the studies, sometimes by the study authors themselves.