3 ms·
> where every individual person can contribute then you need safe harbor. Where every individual can contribute to centralised services If we had a personally
by dingaling 8y ago
> where every individual person can contribute then you need safe harbor.
Where every individual can contribute to centralised services
If we had a personally-hosted, contributor-is-owner Internet then there would be no need for 'safe harbor'. You could post all the Harry Potter content to your own website and when it was taken offline no-one else would be affected.
Safe harbor is a magnificent tool for centralising power. Little wonder that the big corps love it.
- wvenable 8y agoYou have to host your content somewhere. On my own dedicated servers I've personally been hit with requests to remove content that were sent directly to my data center. So you're just wrong about no need for no 'safe harbor' for personally-hosted Internet. You always have to host somewhere or get your connection from someone. And that if that someone isn't as safe harbor they will filter or block you.