3 ms·
Almost every example photo provided in the article are a) reasonably good looking buildings and b) distinct looking in some ways. Not every building needs to be
by ethagknight 8y ago
Almost every example photo provided in the article are a) reasonably good looking buildings and b) distinct looking in some ways. Not every building needs to be a landmark icon. Most properties, like most homes, are just a part of a much larger fabric, and the 4-6 story 'stick and concrete' structures are extremely effective. I am building one of these now, and it is an absolute sweet spot for most of America for construction cost, building codes, density, and schedule. Any taller and we get into high rise building codes and costs sky rocket. Lower density is hard to make a real estate play due to land costs in areas you want to place apartments. Wood is super cheap, renewable, and easy as a building material. Most urbanizing US cities could use another 10,000 apartment units like this to support revitalization of the urban cores across America.
- tomcam 8y agoReally good observations. I wish you had a blog or a podcast discussing your progress on the construction. This subject fascinates me.
- dwd 8y agoWhat you see a lot of low-rise apartments in Australia using is prefabricated frames and trusses and either autoclaved aerated concrete or polystyrene cladding. Because of the light weight you see all sorts of modern designs using colourful sunhoods and blades to make the buildings more distinctive.