It's never a good sign when an article on the predictive power of genes manages to talk about Nazis before mentioning DNA. Among other issues, this seems like

It's never a good sign when an article on the predictive power of genes manages to talk about Nazis before mentioning DNA. Among other issues, this seems like yet another case of someone confusing "environmental" with unpredictable or non-natal. An increasing appreciation of epigenetics is not the same as a dismissal of the role of genes. And a lot of the the other arguments are seriously misleading, like implying incomplete dominance is somehow a blow to our knowledge of genetics, or sleight of hand, like saying genes aren't 'primary' because something has to read them and implying that diminishes their effect.