3 ms·
Bare minimum, how come? Most standardized image processing datasets have very low resolution images.
by gnulinux 8y ago
Bare minimum, how come? Most standardized image processing datasets have very low resolution images.
- p1necone 8y agoYes, my point is that that is not good enough. Two problems that I can see: 1. What use cases are there for a photo processing algorithm that only spits out tiny thumbnails? 2. If it can output higher resolution images, why are all of the examples tiny thumbnails? You can hide a lot of otherwise obvious flaws with a tiny thumbnail.
- PeterisP 8y agoBecause of computing power issues - training a good model with a significantly higher resolution becomes a lot more expensive. If you're doing a proof of concept or analyzing algorithms, you stick to lower resolutions; at larger resolutions the algorithm (and its effects) are the same, but you just need ten or hundred or thousand times more hardware and/or time.