I am aware and dont keep case law on file for every topic that runs counter to the collective conscious, but logically does your decision path make sense? If I

I am aware and dont keep case law on file for every topic that runs counter to the collective conscious, but logically does your decision path make sense? If I decide not to prove something in the most arbitrary way anyone asks then the different world view does not exist? Are you sure? I could see how you might be used to that in other topics, but in case law it wouldnt