I meant to suggest that the language be made in the language. Changing your process to accomodate a misfeature is not a fix, it is a work-around. We agree tha

I meant to suggest that the language be made in the language. Changing your process to accomodate a misfeature is not a fix, it is a work-around. We agree that this is a case where computer-enforced order is more important than programmer freedom, though you could create human processes to work around the danger that such freedom affords you. I'm starting to get to the point of just wanting sexps everywhere...