This seems just like either a ridiculous cry for attention, or else another philosopher that is lost in relativism. There are many good arguments for saying ve

This seems just like either a ridiculous cry for attention, or else another philosopher that is lost in relativism. There are many good arguments for saying vegetarianism is ethically not strong enough (e.g. the amount of critters killed in modern agriculture) but this ain't one. And even then - if vegetarianism in his world is not ethically defensible then eating animals would be even less defensible. Settle on the smaller evil and you're good to go from the position of most ethical systems.