4 ms·
I assumed the infuriating ambiguity is intentional, in order to train some algorithm they need to know what the prevailing human correct judgement is in dicey s
by menacingly 8y ago
I assumed the infuriating ambiguity is intentional, in order to train some algorithm they need to know what the prevailing human correct judgement is in dicey situations
- jonas21 8y agoI don't think it's intentional -- it probably just emerges from the training process. I'm guessing they do something like load up a batch of images and once N people agree on one, record the answer and remove it from the rotation. You end up left with the ambiguous images where people couldn't agree.
- iheartpotatoes 8y agoThen why do I keep seeing the same g-damn FIRE HYDRANT! :)