You're dismissing my point and deflecting with something that I neither referenced nor disputed. You made this claim: >the "anti-brown people" narrative absol

You're dismissing my point and deflecting with something that I neither referenced nor disputed. You made this claim: >the "anti-brown people" narrative absolutely dissolves in the face of the massive overrepresentation of Indians and other Asians. Nothing you have said constitutes absolute dissolution of this narrative. The one measurable claim you made was overrepresentation of Indians and other Asians, which holds no water in light of drastic underrepresentation at the senior level. After I pointed that out, you responded with why you believe that discrepancy could be justified. How does that constitute irrefutable evidence that the narrative is misguided?