3 ms·
I don't think anyone questions the legality of it. Articles like this are intended to convince people that the current system is unfair and to write their repr
by jimktrains2 8y ago
I don't think anyone questions the legality of it. Articles like this are intended to convince people that the current system is unfair and to write their representatives and senators, even if they don't state that specifically.
- slantyyz 8y ago>> Articles like this are intended to convince people that the current system is unfair and to write their representatives and senators, even if they don't state that specifically. The problem is that if you don't state it clearly and specifically, that message will be lost on most people, and they'll still redirect their anger at the company as opposed to the actual source of the problem.
- chc 8y agoThis article repeatedly calls out "Congress" and "Trump" as the major responsible parties. I don't see how that could be conveyed much more clearly.
- qudat 8y ago> to write their representatives and senators Do you have references to any articles that evaluate the efficacy of this? It seems like an effort in futility to me.
- reallydude 8y agoits been effective on niche policy issues within states, but at the federal level the representatives simply lie about what they have "heard" from constituents.