> Government-controlled is only a positive if it means the government can control the thing better than private organizations I don't agree with that. There ar

> Government-controlled is only a positive if it means the government can control the thing better than private organizations I don't agree with that. There are a lot of reason why government-controlled things can be a positive, even if they aren't better than private versions of those things. Sometimes simply having access for all, even if the access isn't as high quality as private access is useful. Having access for people with disabilities when it's not in the financial interest of private companies to serve those people is useful, for example.