3 ms·
I don't know anyone who believes in Claim 1 as you've presented it. There is an alternate version that I do believe "All populations of people are inherently v
by dontreact 8y ago
I don't know anyone who believes in Claim 1 as you've presented it. There is an alternate version that I do believe
"All populations of people are inherently valuable and therefore should not be left behind by advancements in technology"
The examples I gave were both cases where it was not obvious at all to predict that the skills would be needed.
For example, while the low level circuit designer probably won't benefit from cultural and racial awareness, he may not always be a low level circuit designer in the company. He may rise in the company and start making decisions about how/where/which circuits are built. And at some point having cultural and racial awareness would be a benefit.
- ralusek 8y agoAll populations are inherently valuable, to whom? Every business values every population intrinsically? How do you decide how valuable they are? Do you need to hire as many Maori from New Zealand and as many Inuit from Alaska as their world populations would dictate, or are their intrinsic values allowed to differ in any capacity?
- dontreact 8y agoLet me rephrase Individuals are valuable regardless of group memberships. Therefore it makes sense to avoid leaving large groups of people behind, regardless of which group it is.