3 ms·
Ok, so your hypothesis is that this benchmark is fairly frequently executed, so that it's reasonable to think that a precompiled version is stored somewhere? I
by mdda 16y ago
Ok, so your hypothesis is that this benchmark is fairly frequently executed, so that it's reasonable to think that a precompiled version is stored somewhere?
In that case, to avoid the accusation of cheating, the choice of precompiled code should have an algorithmic basis : For instance, something akin to Alexa rank of the .js at various CDN. That would make sure that JQuery would be precompiled, which could well be rational.
But I seriously doubt that such an objective method would include this benchmark code in the IE precompiled payload...
- scottdw2 16y agoIf they have the ability to precompiled JS code, they would, of course, precompile the benchmark. Why would you run a benchmark in "slow" mode if you had a fast mode available? There's nothing wrong with precompiling the benchmark. I'm not saying that's what they are doing, because I don't know. I'm saying that the conclusion of cheating is unfounded.