3 ms·
This is a strong, clickbaity claim, which seems quite hard to prove :) But seriously: it may be essential for legal reasons to be 100% sure that an automatical
by lqet 8y ago
This is a strong, clickbaity claim, which seems quite hard to prove :)
But seriously: it may be essential for legal reasons to be 100% sure that an automatically generated face does in fact not depict a real-life person.
- misterdoubt 8y agoNo more than it is essential to be 100% sure that a painting does not depict a real-life person.
- lqet 8y agoA painting is usually immediately recognizable as a work of art / fiction. Do you want to appear as a team member on an escort service site which uses automatically generated placeholder images to protect their employees? Do you want your face on a billboard ad for Viagra? There is a huge difference between "hey, that painting looks like you" and "hey, that is a photograph of you".
- hopler 8y agoWhy? Is it illegal to look like someone else? I look like my sister and my dad.
- slg 8y agoThat almost certainly isn't needed for a project like this, but I wonder if it would be needed to try to make money off this. It might be like the whole "The events depicted in this movie are fictitious..." warning you see at the end of almost every movie regardless of it is some realistic and plausible story or if it something like Avatar.
- pexaizix 8y agohttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/11/spanish-mp-fbi-al-qaida https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/11/spanish-mp-fbi...