4 ms·
FYI .htaccess shouldn't generally be publically readable, as it's for your webserver, not the public. It's also only relevant to the directory it's in, hence wh
by amaccuish 8y ago
FYI .htaccess shouldn't generally be publically readable, as it's for your webserver, not the public. It's also only relevant to the directory it's in, hence why it's not in a separate directory.
- system2 8y agonginx is your friend.
- cabaalis 8y agoWhy are dotfiles generally considered "hidden" and not to be served (such as .htaccess, .env, etc) but .well-known is expressly intended to be served? It should have just been named well-known, IMO.
- geofft 8y agoBecause that made it unlikely to collide with existing / claimable uses. Consider https://github.com/well-known https://github.com/well-known or https://instagram.com/well-known https://instagram.com/well-known .