3 ms·
The first time I worked in a NGO, it was a Gates mission. We had a very small budget, under $100k. The mission was part of the Millenium Village Project, and t
by sametmax 8y ago
The first time I worked in a NGO, it was a Gates mission. We had a very small budget, under $100k.
The mission was part of the Millenium Village Project, and the various entities adhering to MVP were managing our money. The Gates foundation never checked how it was used.
And 37% of this budget stayed in new york, as a management fee.
14% of this budget stayed at the local MVP antenna, again as a management fee.
What were they managing you ask ? Well, one thing was our budget: if we ever had to order something, we needed to go through them, "to avoid inappropriate spendings". Once, I ordered a printer, knowing exactly the price of the device. It arrived alright, but the bill stated twice the price it should have cost.
The NGO in the street next to us had a worse story. We managed to perform our mission. They didn't. Yet they consummed $ 2 millions doing so.
For the 3 years I have been active in Africa, every time I went on a mission, no matter the degree of success, a marvelous report with shiny graphs was sent to our backers stating how great we did on the field. According to them, I saved so many children overpopulation is probably kinda my fault now.
We never heard once from the Gates foundation. Like you said, they sprayed and prayed.
One time, we had a gig from MS themself. We were supposed to do a conference over a few days in Senegal with their money. One MS guy came the first hour, distributed a few t-shirts, then leaved forever. We decided "fuck that", and proceded to give a training on Linux based products for the rest of the conf.
That's how ridiculous all that is.
- iguy 8y ago> no matter the degree of success, a marvelous report with shiny graphs was sent to our backers stating how great we did This seems like the core problem: every organisation's incentives are to look good to those paying, and if you're in the aid business, these people are not the poor. Spending 37% on new york people who can make just the perfect glossy report & get it into the hands of the people who matter... this may well be the right move for your organisation. There are other incentives too. Lots of academics need fieldwork time on their CVs. Lots of rich people's kids need management experience for their CVs, and something to talk about at parties. I'm happy to believe that Mr Gates's motivations are sincere, but the whole industry seems rotten to me.
- pas 8y agoWhy is it bad that some people are not effective altruists? (Of course if someone is just giving out of guilt, then the shiny booklet industry is a scam basically, but I don't think we have data about this.)
- intellisense 8y agoNo organization is perfect. Because organizations are made of people and people are not perfect. Can the resources be utilized in a better way? maybe so. Even with all these inefficiencies what Bill Gates is doing through his foundation should be commended.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]