If the effect on women will be nearly nil, then does it all become a PR question? In that case, couldn't it be useful to keep the app if only to keep track of

If the effect on women will be nearly nil, then does it all become a PR question? In that case, couldn't it be useful to keep the app if only to keep track of how many people this policy affects? I drew analogies to FOSTA because even FOSTA's intended effect (as stated) was negative. Yes, it actually made it a bit more difficult to do sex trafficking online (along with adversely affecting tons of other people). As a result, traffickers are harder to catch. The "don't deal with the bad guys" approach sounds great, but even an embargo doesn't often work: see what years of sanctions got us with Cuba, NK, and Iran (in terms of improving the lives of people in those countries).