4 ms·
Both Alphabet and marketers are biased, I have no idea why it would have to be one or the other. A search engine fails to produce results about the biggest sca
by calibas 8y ago
Both Alphabet and marketers are biased, I have no idea why it would have to be one or the other.
A search engine fails to produce results about the biggest scandal of a politician's career, and I'm supposed to believe it's simply being objective and I'm the one being biased.
- bduerst 8y agoSo you at least understand now how DDG is Bing? Wikipedia lists her relationship as a footnote in her personal life, hardly the mountain you're making it out to be. Are you going to accuse Wikipedia of being biased too? You're free to set your own burden of proof and believe whatever you want to, but that doesn't necessarily make it fact.
- calibas 8y agoNo, if anything I'm more convinced they're different because they produce significantly different results when searching for "Kamala Harris". She slept with Willie Brown, who was already married, and then he helped her get a nice job. I guess if Wikipedia tells you it's not important, it's not important because Wikipedia is unbiased. Did read that on Wikipedia, does it tell you it's unbiased? I'm a writer for Wikipedia, by the way, and I'm biased. In fact every human being has biases.