4 ms·
I can only speak for myself, but I've used vim plugins on almost every IDE I've ever used. Unlike editor shortcuts, which are often exclusive to a certain IDE,
by emsy 8y ago
I can only speak for myself, but I've used vim plugins on almost every IDE I've ever used. Unlike editor shortcuts, which are often exclusive to a certain IDE, vim is transferable and that's how it has one of the best cost/benefit ratios for me.
- SketchySeaBeast 8y ago> Unlike editor shortcuts, which are often exclusive to a certain IDE, vim is transferable and that's how it has one of the best cost/benefit ratios for me. Doesn't that just mean you've selected VIM's syntax for all your IDE's? Most IDE's seem to have plugins for other popular editors.
- NegativeLatency 8y agoSeems like it’s the difference between him being supported in many IDEs and say visual studio shortcuts being supported in some thing like Atom. (Support May exist for this, IDK)
- SketchySeaBeast 8y agoTrue, VIM may not be better, but it's a standard so it's well supported.
- weaksauce 8y agoNo, vim is a layer on top of the ide. normal keyboard shortcuts and other editor features still work in say Xcode or visual studio.
- emsy 8y agoI can't reply directly to SketchySeaBeast but you're right, there are probably alternatives. Emacs shortcuts are widely used on terminal emulators iirc. Vim is just one option for a portable, efficient way to edit text.
- heavenlyblue 8y agoSo does vim support proper refactoring as it is in IntelliJ IDEA for any locally-scoped variable?
- antew 8y agoNo, but you can use the Vim plugin for IntelliJ and get it that way! There are Vim plug-ins for every IDE I've used.