> Quite the opposite: it’s far too easy to read semver as implying that as long as you increment the major version when you make an incompatible change, everyth

> Quite the opposite: it’s far too easy to read semver as implying that as long as you increment the major version when you make an incompatible change, everything else will work out. The example shows that this is not the case. and if you do that too often then you either end up with a bunch of maintenance on old versions or a use base that hates you. Isn't that the real disincentive?