4 ms·
Also fundamentally you can look at it like this: If I (as a nation-state) had the ability to embed a kill switch embedded into the telecoms hardware on which ot
by FooHentai 8y ago
Also fundamentally you can look at it like this: If I (as a nation-state) had the ability to embed a kill switch embedded into the telecoms hardware on which other nations depend, and over which I had exclusive knowledge and control, would it be in my interests to do that? Of course it would. Irrespective of which nation state we're talking about that's a Good Idea.
Also, technically such a backdoor capability is almost undetectable (down to a sub-microcode analysis level), as per the Ken Thompson compiler hack.
- nneonneo 8y agoIt doesn’t even need to be a killswitch. If the hardware checks firmware signatures (as it reasonably should), then I can just hold a critical patch hostage. You can’t patch against some nasty bug until $DEMAND is met - and meanwhile I can sell the exploit to some other enemy of yours and let them have fun with your systems.