3 ms·
The market segment of "people who are willing to pay a premium for computing devices" is pretty vast, isn't it? Most people would be fine with a $200 Chromeboo
by JohnBooty 8y ago
The market segment of "people who are willing to pay a premium for computing devices" is pretty vast, isn't it?
Most people would be fine with a $200 Chromebook, $500 bare-bones Windows notebook, or a garden-variety PC from 2007 but millions of us choose to pay more because we value the additional things that newer, more powerful computing devices give us.
Lots of professionals and enthusiasts gladly pay large premiums for higher-spec gear, even when the improvements are quite small, because those small improvements are enjoyed over many thousands of hours of lifetime use.
Perhaps more to the point, you already see gamers paying premiums for higher-specced memory to enable their overclocking and tweaking endeavors.
So I definitely think there's a market of people who'd pay more for ECC...
- vbezhenar 8y agoI guess they will pay for higher frequency, but for ECC? Not so much. It won't help to achieve higher geek rating after all. I might be totally wrong about it, of course.
- brokenmachine 8y agoJust like I paid extra for a nice PSU instead of the very cheapest, I would pay more for ECC. The cost difference for ECC amortized over the life of the hardware is negligible compared to the annoyance and time spent trying to work out what's causing those random bluescreens/reboots/corruption.