2 ms·
I quite like that scheme. It saves all the debate about whether to increment the 2nd or 3rd number. The downside to such a scheme in terms of production releas
by quickthrower2 8y ago
I quite like that scheme. It saves all the debate about whether to increment the 2nd or 3rd number.
The downside to such a scheme in terms of production releases (rather than libraries), is I have where 2.3 might need a fix for production, while 2.4 is being worked on. So the natural release number is 2.3.1. With ComVer you are forced to make your production fix 2.4 and rename the WIP version 2.5 which can be a pain depending on your JIRA/CI setup etc.