3 ms·
It's basically meaningless when you try to line languages up with that sort of criterion. Go compiles fast enough that you can use it with a wrapper "interpret
by regularfry 8y ago
It's basically meaningless when you try to line languages up with that sort of criterion.
Go compiles fast enough that you can use it with a wrapper "interpreter": https://github.com/erning/gorun https://github.com/erning/gorun
So does C: https://github.com/ryanmjacobs/c https://github.com/ryanmjacobs/c
So does Haskell: https://stackoverflow.com/a/8676377 https://stackoverflow.com/a/8676377
So does f#, via `#!/usr/bin/env fsharpi --exec` I think
You can compile python: https://github.com/dropbox/pyston https://github.com/dropbox/pyston
You can compile JS: http://enclosejs.com/ http://enclosejs.com/
I wouldn't be surprised if someone found a way to AOT-compile bash, but I'm not going to bother looking for that.
The only criterion I've found which makes some sort of sense is whether the language designers consider "scripting" a use case to actively support and use to drive language features, or if it's a second-class citizen.
- tokyodude 8y agoYou seem to have ignored "most common usage". None of your examples are "most common usage"